From 1315051d5f0d19eb0910d3e7e8641b28cc29ca4f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jake Howard Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 09:10:34 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Apparently --- content/posts/arch-revert-to-date.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/content/posts/arch-revert-to-date.md b/content/posts/arch-revert-to-date.md index 0e76f24..823a730 100644 --- a/content/posts/arch-revert-to-date.md +++ b/content/posts/arch-revert-to-date.md @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ image: https://www.lumalab.net/download/archlogo/arch-logo-shiny-dark.png subtitle: Arch is well known for going wrong, but today was the first time this affected me doing my job --- -I'm one of those Arch users that doesn't use arch properly: I install updates daily, including packages from the AUR. This has the great benefit of giving me the most up-to-date packages available from upstream. This has the downside of meaning I have the latest packages from upstream, meaning if something breaks, even temporarily, it breaks for me. +I'm one of those Arch users who _apparently_ doesn't use arch properly: I install updates daily, including packages from the AUR. This has the great benefit of giving me the most up-to-date packages available from upstream. However the downside of meaning I have the latest packages from upstream, meaning if something breaks, even temporarily, it breaks for me. I'm also one of those _crazy_ people who uses arch on my work machine. Craziness aside, it's never caused me an issue, until today.